snapback-sanctions Sparks Intense Backlash: 5 Major Risks Europe Faces
snapback-sanctions: Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Slams European Powers Over UN Plan
Iran has sharply criticised a plan by European powers to reimpose snapback-sanctions, warning they are politically motivated and risk destabilising diplomatic efforts. The tensions centre on demands by Britain, France and Germany (known as the “E3”) that Tehran meet certain conditions — including restoring access for U.N. nuclear inspectors and engaging in further talks — by the end of September 2025. If Iran fails to comply, the E3 plan to trigger UN sanctions that were lifted under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
What’s going on?
- In late August 2025, the E3 launched a 30-day process to reimpose UN sanctions via the snapback-sanctions mechanism unless Iran meets specific conditions. (Reuters)
- Those conditions include giving U.N. nuclear inspectors access to Iranian sites, accounting for Iran’s enriched uranium stocks, and engaging in talks with the United States. (Reuters)
- Iran, however, has rejected parts of the European demands as unreasonable and has presented what it calls a “reasonable and actionable plan.” (Reuters)
- On Sept 19, 2025, Saeed Khatibzadeh, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister, told reporters in Geneva that the snapback-sanctions plan by Europe is “politically biased and politically motivated … They are wrong on different levels by trying to misuse the mechanism embedded in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).” (Reuters)
Deputy Foreign Minister’s Criticism
Khatibzadeh’s main criticisms of the European powers over snapback-sanctions include:
- Political bias & political motivation: He accuses Europe of using the snapback mechanism not strictly as a legal/diplomatic tool, but to achieve political ends. (Reuters)
- Misuse of the JCPOA mechanism: He claims the European powers are misapplying or abusing clauses of the deal, particularly around triggering snapback without full justification. (Reuters)
- Unpredictability & risk: He warned that if Europe proceeds, it would raise unpredictability to the highest levels possible and that Europe will be responsible for any future risks resulting from this path. (Reuters)
Where things stand now
- Talks so far have not produced what the Europeans consider sufficient progress. Diplomats say Iran has not yet taken all reasonable and precise actions demanded by the E3 to forestall snapback-sanctions. (Reuters)
- Iran has resumed some cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in principle, including inspections of nuclear sites. However, European powers argue the agreement lacks detail, firm timelines, and confidence that Iran will fully comply. (Reuters)
- Meanwhile, a U.N. Security Council vote is expected, which would permanently lift U.N. sanctions on Iran — though diplomats expect it will fail, needing at least nine votes, or could be vetoed by the U.S., Britain or France. (Reuters)
Potential Consequences
- If Iran fails to satisfy the E3 conditions by end of September, snapback-sanctions likely will be reinstated. (Reuters)
- That could deepen Iran’s economic isolation and also raise tensions in diplomatic relations between Iran and the European powers.
- It may also impact regional stability, given Iran’s strategic role in Middle East politics.
- Legal and diplomatic challenges could intensify: Iran’s claim that the mechanism is misused may lead to disputes in international fora; the Europe side may argue that legal precedent and treaty clauses support their actions.
Iran’s Response & Alternative Proposal
- Iran says it has made a “fair proposal” to avert the implementation of snapback-sanctions. (Al Arabiya English)
- Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has called for a “positive approach and goodwill” from the E3, urging that escalation is in no one’s interest. (Reuters)
Broader Context
- JCPOA (2015): The nuclear deal under which Iran agreed to limit its nuclear programme in return for sanction relief. The snapback mechanism is part of its enforcement architecture. (Reuters)
- Departure of the US (2018): When the U.S. withdrew under President Trump, many obligations and expectations shifted; Iran argues Europe did not fulfil their parts after that point. (Al Jazeera)
- Global scrutiny of Iran’s nuclear programme: Concerns over enrichment levels, inspector access, and uranium stockpiles have driven much of the pressure. (Reuters)
FAQs: Frequently Asked Questions
- What are snapback-sanctions?
Snapback-sanctions are automatic reinstatements of U.N. sanctions under the JCPOA if a party (in this case Iran) fails to meet specified conditions. They’re meant to provide a clear enforcement mechanism. (Reuters) - Who are the E3?
The E3 refers to Britain, France, and Germany — European powers leading diplomatic engagement with Iran under the JCPOA framework. (Reuters) - What conditions are Europe demanding from Iran?
Key demands include restoring access for U.N. nuclear inspectors, accounting for its enriched uranium stockpiles, and engaging in talks with the United States. (Reuters) - Why is Iran rejecting or criticising the snapback-sanctions plan?
Iran says the plan is politically biased and the mechanism is being misused. It also claims Europe has not fulfilled its obligations under the JCPOA after the U.S. withdrawal, and that Europe’s demands lack fairness or balanced negotiation. (Reuters) - What happens if snapback sanctions are reimposed?
Consequences include economic sanctions being reinstated, which may impact Iran’s banking, oil exports, international trade and diplomatic relations. It may also lead to legal, political and diplomatic fallout, and could decrease trust between Iran and European parties, making future negotiation more difficult. - Is there still room for diplomacy?
Yes. Iran has made a proposal it describes as “reasonable and actionable,” and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has called for a positive and goodwill-based approach from Europe. But whether that will satisfy the conditions set by the E3 is uncertain. (Reuters) - When will the snapback-sanctions decision take effect (if reimposed)?
Europe has set a deadline toward the end of September 2025 for Iran to meet conditions. If not met, the snapback-sanctions would be applied. (Reuters)
External References
Here are five external links for reference and further reading:
- Reuters: Iran’s deputy foreign minister criticises European powers over sanctions plan (Reuters)
- Reuters: Iran and European ministers make little progress as renewed UN sanctions loom (Reuters)
- Al Arabiya: Iran says made ‘fair’ proposal to avert UN snapback sanctions (Al Arabiya English)
- Reuters: UN sanctions on Iran to be reimposed, France’s Macron says (Reuters)
- Al Jazeera: Iran FM Araghchi warns Europe against ‘reckless’ approach to nuclear deal (Al Jazeera)
Breaking News Snippets
- “Iran decries Europe’s snapback-sanctions scheme”
- “Snapback-sanctions considered misuse, says Iran”
- “E3 demand inspectors access or sanctions”
- “Iran proposes fair plan amid snapback”
- “Diplomacy vs sanctions: Iran warns Europe”
For More News. Stay Tuned to Internet BuzzFeed